The “Rosemary’s Baby” of Investment Products

picture-of-rosemarys-baby-photo

Talk about an investment where the glass is always half empty! Indexed annuity products are the eternal pessimists.  The fact that they do not include dividends in their return calculations pretty much guarantees they will miss about half of the markets historic gains over time.

In a not so shocking turn of events, these products are often found in the murky waters of the 403(b) world. They are also embedded in the portfolios of many elderly investors seeking “protection” from market volatility.

Dividends play a huge role in stock market returns. Morgan Housel reveals a statistical gem in this brilliant post.

It’s hard to believe that over the last 100 years the S&P 500 rose 273-fold, but, adjusted for dividends, it rose 18,520-fold. Never has so little attention been paid to a portion of investment returns that matters so much.

Now, imagine if someone approached you with an investment that promised market returns with little risk. Better yet, this could also be accomplished without including reinvested dividends!

This pitch violates all precepts of rational evidence based investing. Insurance companies have given birth to the Rosemary’s Baby of finance, the fixed-indexed annuity.

According to a warning from the Florida Department of Financial Services:

Often touted as a way for investors to realize stock-market-like gains without the risk, equity indexed annuities have proven confusing to some investors who have complained to the Department of Financial Services Consumer Helpline of being misled about how the product works or not having their expectations met.  These products can come with hidden penalties, costs and fees, and hefty multi-year surrender charges and may not be ideal for some senior citizens.  

In addition to these wonderful features, here is the real kicker.

Most fixed-indexed annuity increases are tied to index increases deriving from market price changes only, and exclude any increase due to the payment of dividends. For example, in 1998 the total return (i.e., capital gains and dividends) for the S&P 500® Index as reported by Ibbotson Associates was 28.6%, while that for just capital gains (i.e., market price) was 26.7%. A fixed-indexed annuity tied to the S&P 500® Index would typically use the smaller (26.7%) return. Couple that with an example participation rate of 90%, and the increase in the indexed annuity becomes just 24%, some 4.6% below the total increase of the market index. And remember, historically dividends have made up 40% of the total S&P 500 ® return! (AnnuityFYI)

So when all is said and done, fixed-index annuity investors receive the following:

  1. Bond like returns with many unnecessary layers of complexity
  2. Hedge fund like fees.
  3. Steep surrender charges greatly reducing liquidity. Translation, you can’t sell this crap when you might need to.
  4. Counter party risk that is unnecessary. Since you are transferring your risk to an insurance company, an investor is at the mercy of the insurer’s financial situation. Insurance companies can go bankrupt.
  5. The upside is capped and often reset. This means the market can go up 15% but an investor’s maximum gain may be 5%!

These products are so deceptive regulators forced the insurers to rename them fixed index annuities from their former misleading name, equity indexed annuities. In the words of Jane Bryant Quinn“They were sold as being linked to the stock market and that you could make some market gain. But as soon as the regulators started [scrutinizing] that, the name was changed to fixed index annuities.”

 Unfortunately, this product is sold and not purchased. The reason this confusing and misleading investment is found in many retirement portfolios are two-fold. First, it falsely promises the impossible, high returns with no risk. Second, there are tremendous financial incentives in the form of high fees and other perks for conflicted salespeople to push this product upon teachers and other unsuspecting investors.

Neither of these reasons are sound criteria to have an indexed annuity or any other investment in a retirement portfolio. The results have been sad yet predictable.

There is no chance you will travel faster than the guy next to you if you are rowing against the current and he isn’t. When it comes to fixed-indexed annuities, the current is twice as strong.

High fees and the exclusion of dividends will literally sink your investment boat before the race even starts.

 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Weighing The Week Ahead: Time To Sell The News? | OptionFN commented on Apr 18

    […] in this special edition. There are several great posts, but I especially liked the advice about The “Rosemary’s Baby” of Investment Products by Tony Isola. He explains well the drawbacks from indexed annuities, a popular current […]

  2. Weighing The Week Ahead: Time To Sell The News? | Stock Market News commented on Apr 18

    […] Professional investors and traders have been making Abnormal Returns a daily stop for over ten years. The average investor should make time (even if not able to read AR every day as I do) for a weekly trip on Wednesdays. Tadas always has first-rate links for investors in this special edition. There are several great posts, but I especially liked the advice about The “Rosemary’s Baby” of Investment Products […]

  3. Weighing The Week Ahead: Time To Sell The News? | InvestingLab.com commented on Apr 18

    […] in this special edition. There are several great posts, but I especially liked the advice about The “Rosemary’s Baby” of Investment Products by Tony Isola. He explains well the drawbacks from indexed annuities, a popular current […]

  4. Where the Hindenburg Meets the Titanic commented on Feb 06

    […] in its sub-account. Instead it places one of the most indecipherable products on the planet, the structured product, as its […]

  5. How to Create Your Own Equity-Indexed Annuity commented on Mar 31

    […] majority of people who purchase equity-indexed annuities have no idea they could accomplish their goals in a much cheaper, simpler way. Equity-indexed […]

  6. Homepage commented on Oct 11

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Infos here: tonyisola.com/2016/04/the-rosemarys-baby-of-investment-products-2/ […]