The Most Expensive Tuition

Experience is a good school, but the tuition can be too high.  Many investors often don’t get what they pay for.

Teachers will frequently complain to us that their spouses have higher balances in their 401(k) than what is in their 403(b)s, in spite of the fact they started contributing similar amounts at roughly the same time.  In addition, their asset allocations were comparable.

What gives?

A very bright teacher sent me the following data. She compared her husband’s corporate 401(k) to her own public school’s K-12 403(b) and came to a startling conclusion.  In her words:

“I did a really simple analysis of my husband’s contributions and returns vs. my 403(b) contributions and returns. The results are pretty shocking:

His total contribution (including employer contribution) was $234,794

Return was $294,545

My contribution was $140,277

Return was $45,078

This is over a similar time frame.   I would guess that my poor return was not due solely to the high fees, but also the quality of the product I was offered and the fees associated with those products.”


“In any case, it has been a useful example for me to show my colleagues who will listen :)”

Not so sure about that.

Fees matter.  A LOT! Assuming a $100,000 investment and a 6% annual return, the results from this Vanguard chart* spanning 25 years verify her “back of the envelope” analysis.


Sadly this is what happens when one spouse has the option of using low-cost index funds while the other is left with an expensive variable annuity.  This illustrates the dramatic effect when one retirement plan has rules that make employers look at investment fees, and the other doesn’t.

Multiply this number by a few million people and you can see how investors are annually overcharged to the tune of $17 billion.

Barron’s recently came out with an article, “In Fund Management, Winning Trends Persist,” and they ranked the criterion that leads to superior mutual fund returns. It is no surprise that low fees are at the top of the list.

Here is their take:  “Cheap funds soar; expensive funds flounder. Fees are the most reliable indicator of fund performance. Russ Kinnel, director of manager research at Morningstar, found that 62% of U.S. equity funds in the lowest quintile for fees beat their benchmark from 2010 to 2015. That compared with 20% in the highest-cost quintile, confirming findings from earlier periods.”

Conversely, as my teacher friend so rudely found out:

“While funds with low costs are an impressively good bet, funds with high costs are an impressively bad bet.”

Many discover this after it is too late. Decades of valuable compounding are needlessly thrown into the trash bin. These years can never be recovered. Worse, these dollars were a massive wealth transfer from a person’s retirement account directly into the pockets of conflicted financial salespeople.

People complain about the high cost of tuition for private universities. These figures pale in comparison to the enormous expense for investors who learn the hard way about high-fee investments.

School yourself before this happens.

We are here to help. Our firm sells knowledge, not products.

Your spouse is most likely not an investing genius. He/she just happens to have access to low- cost investments.

We can make these available to you on your 403(b) platform.

In the words of Rick Ferri, “There are risks, there is return, and there are costs, all else is marketing.”

The cost of falling for investment marketing over low fees is the most expensive tuition you will ever pay.


* Source: Vanguard.  This chart shows how investment costs can eat away at your savings. If you have $100,000 invested, it could grow to $430,000 without any investment costs. But if you pay only 2% a year in costs, it could grow to only $260,000. You would lose about $170,000 to costs.  This hypothetical illustration doesn’t represent any particular investment nor does it account for inflation. “What you lose to costs” represents both the amount paid in expenses as well as the “opportunity costs”—the amount you lose because the costs you paid are no longer invested. There may be other material differences between investment products that must be considered prior to investing. Numbers are rounded.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.