The 5 Most Insane Quotes Against the Fiduciary Rule

US President Donald Trump shakes the hand of Rep. Ann Wagner (R-MO) after signing a memorandum about Labor Department rules on investing in the Oval Office of the White House on February 3, 2017 in Washington, DC.

The opinions found on social media can be a dark jungle of misinformation and lies. This is not a surprise, based on the following facts:

  • A large number of people do not know The Affordable Care Act and Obama Care are the same thing.
  • One in six believe it would be “very good” for the army to rule.
  • Only 30% of people born in the 1980s think it is essential for them to live in a democracy.

While the train to crazy town is constantly adding new passengers, one issue really sticks out.

The opposition to the proposed fiduciary rule, which would force the financial services to act in the best interest of clients’ retirement accounts takes the cake.

The conflicted crazies have come out in force. Here is my top five list of the most insane arguments:

  1. Donald Trump’s Press Secretary, Sean Spicer – “The rule is a solution in search of a problem.” In the words of our CEO Josh Brown, Spicer knows less than John Snow. I wonder if he would feel this way if his 80-year old grandmother had a variable annuity inside her IRA with a 10-year surrender fee?
  2. The Wall Street Journal’s Editorial Board – “Robert Litan and Hal Singer have estimated that depriving small investors of human advice could cost clients $80 billion in a downturn.” Maybe they were confusing this with the $80 billion reasons why investors should not work with “humans” who sell them non-publicly traded real estate and leveraged currency funds. Give me a cyborg any day.
  3. National Economic Council Director, Gary Cohn – “We think it is a bad rule. It is a bad rule for consumers….This is like putting only healthy food on the menu, because unhealthy food tastes good but you still shouldn’t eat it because you might die younger.”  Ummm not quite. The Cheese Cake Factory clearly labels its chicken wings, fettuccine alfredo, and chocolate cheesecake belly bomb as having 10 gazillion calories. Even still, a person might get pleasure from eating something decadent in spite of the unhealthiness of the choice; when it comes to investing, the only person getting enjoyment from these expensive, inferior investment options is the shill who sold it.  Think of it this way, if your dentist or cardiologist was pushing sugary, fatty foods to you — wouldn’t you find another health care professional?
  4. Dennis Glass, CEO of Lincoln National – He supports a delay to “improve” the rule and “remove some of the confusion in the market place that is contributing to the decline in annuity sales.”  Yes, currently the national crisis we are currently facing is the fact that not enough people are buying variable annuities for their retirement accounts that cost them between 3-4% a year; this is kind of like putting Dracula in charge of the blood supply.
  5. Anne Wagner, Republican Representative, MO. – What we’re doing is we are returning to the American people, low- and middle- income investors, and retirees, their control of their own retirement savings. This is about Main Street.”  Yes Anne, the $780,000 you raised in the last election cycle from the financial sector had absolutely no influence over your opinion. The fact that the disembowelment of this rule is being led by billionaires and politicians controlled by their insurance and brokerage firm overloads would give us no reason to think the interests of “Main Street” would not be given the highest priority.

Compared to this insanity, the buzz on social media that Taylor Swift has no belly button is starting to make more sense to me every day.




This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web