The Sooner You Fall Behind, The More Time You’ll Have to Catch Up

 

Annuities with rolling surrender charges suck. There is no other way to describe these deceptive, shameful products.

For the uninitiated, surrender charges are a way some insurance companies reimburse themselves or, more bluntly stated, collect ransom payments from clients. Companies will pay a salesperson an upfront commission and they need a hedge in case the client bolts from the investment shortly after purchasing it.

Rolling surrender charges are on a whole other level on the stratosphere of financial conflicts of interests!

A rolling surrender charge can be defined as such: In a flexible premium deferred annuity (allowing additional contributions) each deposit will have its own independent surrender charge schedule (i.e., with a five-year surrender charge, each deposit will start the five-year period the day the money is received by the company). Therefore, different amounts of the annuity will be free of surrender charges at different times.

Just like the Terminator, they never quit. If these charges had the voice of an Austrian-accented cyborg their first words would be, “I’ll be back.”

These products are commonly found in many public school teachers’ NON-ERISA 403(b) retirement plans.

We are currently working with a lovely young teacher who was snared in this web of non-transparency.

After educating her on her options, she decided to transfer her account to a transparent, low-fee, globally allocated portfolio that we offer.

This is where her dark journey began.

After speaking to rude call-center employees and filling out a myriad of intentionally confusing forms, she thought she was home free.

This was despite the fact she was told by an employee of the insurance company that she should consult her current financial advisor, otherwise she might make a decision that she would regret.

Not a mention was made about the fact her “current advisor” had not spoken to her in over two years!

She was told the surrender period for the annuity product sold to her was five years.

Since she held this “investment” for seven years, she thought she was free and clear.

Think again! The hammer then came down.

Since she owned a product with a rolling surrender fee, she had to pay surrender fees on her new paycheck contributions from year five through year seven, even though the policy had a five-year limit!

Needless to say she was infuriated. I calmed her down and told her this was part of the tuition she must pay to become a good investor. Though the price may seem steep today, the money spent paying these people off will pay enormous future dividends.

She now has 25 years of investing ahead of her in low-cost index funds, which will make this unpleasantness a mere blip in her future potential to create wealth.

Many teachers we meet with beat themselves up over making these bad choices regarding their retirement plans. I would rather look at the bright side of things.

In the words of the great comedian, Steven Wright, “The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.”

Many would agree with my colleague, Barry Ritholtz, when he stated in disbelief, “How is this even legal?”

I do not have the answer to this but I do know we will not stop until these wrongs are righted.

We are gaining new converts by the day, and new allies by the week.

Some are starting to get uncomfortable with the things we are saying.

My response to them is, “Too bad, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.”

 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web